Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02575
Original file (BC 2014 02575.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:			DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-02575
		
						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  YES



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

She receive retroactive payment of Legacy Incentive Specialty Pay (ISP) for the period 2012 and 2013.  


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She applied for her ISP in a timely manner, but her supervisor at the time refused to certify her eligibility and did not further process her request.  A subsequent Inspector General (IG) investigation determined that her supervisor wrongfully, maliciously, and unjustly downgraded her air force specialty code (AFSC) rendering her ineligible for ISP.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

During the matter in question, the applicant was serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of major (O-4). 

On 24 Apr 09, the applicant was approved for a multi-year nurse corps Incentive Specialty Pay (MISP), effective 1 Mar 09 until 1 Mar 13.

On 9 Sep 13, according to documents submitted by the applicant, IG investigation FRNO 2013-07242 determined there was sufficient evidence to substantiate she was unjustly denied ISP applications/contracts.  

On 28 Nov 14, the applicant was permanently disability retired in the grade of Major (O-4), with a compensable percentage for physical disability of 70 percent, and was credited with 12 years and 9 days of active service.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are included at Exhibits C and D.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPANF recommends granting relief, indicating sufficient evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After reviewing the applicant’s records and documentation submitted, they determined that the applicant submitted a single year ISP request 30 Oct 12 and her supervisor declined to certify her ISP contract.  In Feb 13, her AFSC was downgraded from M46N3E to 46Nl, rendering her ineligible for ISP.  However, in reviewing the details from the IG investigation FRNO 2013-07242, due to the correction of member’s AFSC, and other substantiated claims, she should be authorized ISP.  She was previously on a 1 Mar 09 to 28 Feb 13 MISP contract.  She was not eligible for single year ISP until her previous MISP contract expired.  Based on their review of the applicant’s records and active duty service commitments (ADSC), the requested 30 Oct 12 single year ISP contract effective date was not valid.  The correct effective dates would have been 1 Mar 13 and 1 Mar 14 for the subsequent contracts.

According to the Comptroller General, retroactive administrative pay is generally prohibited barring an administrative error.  In addition, when interpreting statutes, there is a presumption against retroactivity.  Statutes should generally not be read to have retroactive effect unless specific language requires.  Further, Federal Courts have consistently defined “injustice” within Title 10, United States Code (USC), §1552 as behavior or action that rises to the level that “shocks the sense of justice. In their opinion, considering all the circumstances in this case, the applicant's record should now be altered, as the error was on the part of the Air Force, not the member, and the circumstances rise to a level that "shocks the sense of justice" within the meaning of 10 USC § 1552. 

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPANF evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice.  We did note that AFPC/DPANF identified the correct effective dates for the subsequent Nurse ISP contracts would have been 1 Mar 13 and 1 Mar 14.  We note the applicant would not have been able to serve the full period for the 1 Mar 14 contract due to her retirement on 28 Nov 14; however, in view of the fact that she was retired for physical disability, the unearned portion of the ISP for this period will not be subject to recoupment.  Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected as indicated below.	

4.  The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that she was granted Nurse Incentive Specialty Pay (ISP), effective 1 March 2013 and 1 March 2014, at the single year rate.     


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02575 in Executive Session on 21 Apr 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

All members voted to correct the records as recommended.  The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02575 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 14 Jun 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPANF, dated 29 Aug 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Oct 14.

						





Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00204

    Original file (BC 2014 00204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was eligible for NC ISP for FY 12, however, since she filed her contract more than three months after her effective date, the contract would not have been timely submitted and would not have been processed by AFPC Medical Special Pays with the requested effective date. Based on the permanent revocation of her clinical nursing practice she is not eligible for medical special pays to include the FY 13 NC ISP. The applicant contends her FY 12 ISP contract was properly...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00353

    Original file (BC 2014 00353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00353 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive Physician Additional Special Pay (ASP) from 2010 to 2013. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She thought when she filed for her specialty pay bonuses in 2010 that the ASP was part of the Multi-year Incentive Special Pay (MISP) and Multi-year Special Pay (MSP) contracts she submitted, but it was not. The...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01648

    Original file (BC 2014 01648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01648 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive his entitlement to Additional Special Pay (ASP) and Incentive Special Pay (ISP), which was not disbursed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibit C and D. AIR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02380

    Original file (BC 2014 02380.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02380 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive retro-active Additional Special Pay (ASP) for 2012 and 2013. ASP is not indicated on the MSP/MISP contract, nor was the rate for ASP annotated on the MSP/MISP contract that the member states he mistakenly assumed was included. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC 2010 00051

    Original file (BC 2010 00051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    While the advisory noted she received proper and fair consideration for promotion, she believes there are not any AD commanders who would award a definitely promote recommendation to an individual whose record lacked career status, nonselections for promotion, intermediate PME, graduate degree, with a history as a Reserve member competing for promotion on AD with other Regular AF officers who are many years her junior by service time, DOR, total service and age. The applicant contends she...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9801482

    Original file (9801482.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant and counsel on 14 September 1998 for review and response. c. His request to receive Single Year Incentive Special Pay (ISP) in his Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 045A3, was approved by competent authority effective 1 October 1996. d. On 30 September 1997,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01870

    Original file (BC 2014 01870.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01870 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He retroactively receive Medical Corps Additional Special Pay (ASP) and Incentive Special Pay (ISP) with an effective date of 12 Jul 13. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01347

    Original file (BC 2014 01347.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01347 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be paid the Dental Officer Multi-Year Retention Bonus (DOMRB) based on his four-year Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) effective 23 December 2012. In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of his AFRS IMT 1430, Statement of Understanding - Applicant for Extended Active Duty -...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019832

    Original file (20130019832.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show she executed a 4-year Multi-Year Special Pay (MSP)/Multi-Year Incentive Special Pay (MISP) contract effective 1 July 2012 through 30 June 2016 at the rate of $35,000.00 per year for MSP and $31,000.00 per year for MISP. The officer would continue ISP eligibility at the applicable rate for each active year of the MSP contract. In light of the available evidence, it would be appropriate to correct her record to show she entered into a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00163

    Original file (BC 2014 00163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00163 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She receive Board Certification Pay (BCP) for the period 1 Jan 11 through 31 Dec 13. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPANF...